SYSTEMS IN ACTION · Breaking the Frame
A real-world example of frame inversion. Cynthia recognized a dominance tactic, matched the pattern, and restored equilibrium in the room. A Systems-in-Action breakdown of how pattern recognition and structural fluency override intimidation.
Scenario
My colleague Cynthia once walked into a meeting at an OEM car company, where a group of men were loudly discussing one man’s prostate surgery.
They weren’t embarrassed.
They weren’t bonding privately.
They were performing for her and watching her reaction.
It was a tactic
a way to unsettle her before the meeting even began
to signal
We control the room. We decide the tone.
Years earlier, when she was young, the aim had been the same, but the tactic had been different: whistling, sexual jokes, comments under the breath.
Same goal. Destabilization of the only female in the engineering war room.
This time, the “prostate performance” ran on and on, the men smugly assured of themselves and looking at her for a reaction.
Finally Cynthia said, calmly, placing both hands squarely on the table and meeting their eyes:
“Okay. Are we done talking about your prostate surgery now?”
The men laughed, convinced they had won.
She continued:
“Good. Because before we start the meeting, I’d like to tell you about my uterus and the results of my last pap smear.”
Silence.
The frame shattered. The group of men looked down at their notebooks, the performance and gloating now drained from the room.
And the meeting began.
Systems-Thinking Response
What Cynthia did wasn’t bravado.
It was frame inversion, executed with precision.
In group dynamics, whoever controls the emotional frame controls the room.
The men attempted to establish dominance by making her the outsider to their comfort.
Their message:
We are unembarrassed as a unified group.
You should feel off balance.
Cynthia recognized the structure.
She saw the tactic, not the content.
So she matched the pattern
mirrored the move
and inverted the discomfort.
Key system principles at play:
1. She refused the assigned role.
They cast her as the one who would cringe.
She declined the part.
2. She exposed the asymmetry.
Male discomfort had been weaponized against her for years.
Her counter move revealed the asymmetry by flipping it.
3. She reclaimed the agenda.
By ending the charade,
she restored the professional frame they had tried to disrupt.
4. She shifted the system from dominance to equilibrium.
No escalation.
No shaming.
Just a clean reset.
This is Systems Thinking in human form:
See the pattern.
Name the pattern.
Invert the pattern.
Restore the structure.
See more field tests → Systems in Action
Madonna Demir
If you enjoyed reading this, also visit The Power of Crones
